CSS-in-JS: Pros and Cons for Modern Web Development

Explore the pros and cons of CSS-in-JS in modern web development. Learn how this approach impacts styling, maintainability, and performance in large applications

In the world of web development, styling is one of the key aspects of creating a seamless and engaging user experience. Over the years, developers have experimented with various ways of writing CSS—from traditional stylesheets to preprocessors like Sass, and now to the increasingly popular CSS-in-JS approach. CSS-in-JS is a method where you write your CSS directly within your JavaScript code. This technique has gained traction in recent years, especially within React, Vue, and other component-based frameworks.

While CSS-in-JS offers many benefits, like scoped styles and dynamic theming, it also introduces its own set of challenges. In this article, we will explore the pros and cons of CSS-in-JS, giving you a clear understanding of whether it’s the right approach for your next project.

What is CSS-in-JS?

At its core, CSS-in-JS is a technique that allows developers to write CSS directly inside JavaScript files. Instead of managing external .css or .scss files, CSS is defined within components or functions, allowing styles to be tightly coupled with the logic they style. CSS-in-JS libraries such as Styled Components, Emotion, and JSS have made this approach a popular choice for modern frontend frameworks like React.

A basic example of CSS-in-JS using Styled Components in React looks like this:

import styled from 'styled-components';

const Button = styled.button`
background-color: blue;
color: white;
padding: 10px 20px;
border-radius: 5px;
&:hover {
background-color: darkblue;
}
`;

function App() {
return <Button>Click me</Button>;
}

In this example, the Button component is styled directly inside the JavaScript file using the styled function from styled-components. The style is scoped only to this component, ensuring that it won’t affect any other buttons on the page.

Pros of CSS-in-JS

CSS-in-JS has been praised for many reasons, especially in the context of component-based development. Here are some of the top advantages of using CSS-in-JS in modern web development.

1. Scoped Styles

One of the biggest challenges in traditional CSS is managing global styles. In a large project, it’s easy for styles to conflict with each other, causing unintended overrides and making maintenance difficult. CSS-in-JS solves this problem by scoping styles to individual components.

With CSS-in-JS, the styles for a component are encapsulated and will not bleed into other parts of your application. This guarantees that your button styles, for example, will not accidentally override styles on other buttons across your site, making it easier to maintain consistency.

const Button = styled.button`
color: white;
`;

This scoped approach ensures that every style is directly tied to its respective component, making it easier to debug and isolate style issues.

2. Dynamic Styling with Props

CSS-in-JS makes it easy to create dynamic styles by allowing you to use JavaScript logic to manipulate CSS properties. This is particularly useful when dealing with styles that change based on props, state, or user interaction.

For example, you can pass props to a styled component and change its style based on the value of that prop:

const Button = styled.button`
background-color: ${(props) => (props.primary ? 'blue' : 'gray')};
color: white;
padding: 10px 20px;
`;

function App() {
return (
<div>
<Button primary>Primary Button</Button>
<Button>Default Button</Button>
</div>
);
}

In this example, the primary prop determines the background color of the button, allowing you to easily create reusable and flexible components that adapt to different scenarios.

Another major benefit of CSS-in-JS is the ability to implement themes effortlessly.

3. Theming Made Easy

Another major benefit of CSS-in-JS is the ability to implement themes effortlessly. CSS-in-JS libraries typically provide built-in theming solutions that allow you to manage global styles and easily switch between different themes (e.g., light and dark modes) by passing theme objects to your styled components.

With a library like Styled Components, you can define your theme once and then apply it across your entire application:

import { ThemeProvider } from 'styled-components';

const theme = {
colors: {
primary: 'blue',
secondary: 'gray',
},
};

const Button = styled.button`
background-color: ${(props) => props.theme.colors.primary};
color: white;
padding: 10px 20px;
`;

function App() {
return (
<ThemeProvider theme={theme}>
<Button>Primary Button</Button>
</ThemeProvider>
);
}

With the ThemeProvider, you can define your theme once and easily switch or extend it for different parts of your application. This is particularly useful for applications that need to support multiple themes or color schemes.

4. Automatic Vendor Prefixing

When writing CSS for modern web applications, you often need to add vendor prefixes to ensure compatibility across different browsers. CSS-in-JS libraries handle this automatically, saving you from the tedious task of manually adding prefixes to styles that require them.

For example, if you’re using CSS properties that need prefixes like transform or flex, CSS-in-JS libraries will automatically apply the necessary prefixes (-webkit, -moz, etc.), ensuring that your application works seamlessly across all browsers without additional effort.

5. Conditional and Media Queries

CSS-in-JS allows you to write conditional logic and media queries directly inside your component styles, making it easier to implement responsive designs and apply different styles based on screen size or device type.

For example, you can write media queries directly in your styled components:

const Container = styled.div`
width: 100%;
padding: 20px;

@media (min-width: 768px) {
width: 50%;
}
`;

In this example, the container will take up the full width on smaller screens, but when the screen width is greater than 768px, the container’s width will change to 50%.

Cons of CSS-in-JS

While CSS-in-JS offers a variety of benefits, it’s important to recognize that it also comes with its own set of challenges. Here are some of the potential downsides of using CSS-in-JS in modern web development.

1. Performance Overhead

One of the most common criticisms of CSS-in-JS is the performance overhead it can introduce, especially in larger applications. CSS-in-JS libraries often rely on JavaScript to parse and inject styles at runtime, which can lead to slower initial page loads or larger JavaScript bundles. For high-traffic websites or performance-sensitive applications, this extra overhead can be a concern.

However, many CSS-in-JS libraries have been optimized to mitigate this issue by using server-side rendering (SSR) or static CSS extraction, but it’s still something to consider when choosing this approach for larger projects.

2. Learning Curve for New Developers

For developers who are accustomed to traditional CSS or preprocessors like Sass, transitioning to CSS-in-JS can introduce a learning curve. The mental shift from writing CSS in separate files to writing it within JavaScript components can feel unfamiliar and even unintuitive to developers who prefer to keep HTML, CSS, and JavaScript separate.

Additionally, CSS-in-JS requires a good understanding of JavaScript and component-based architecture, which may be difficult for beginners or teams that are used to traditional CSS development workflows.

3. Larger Bundle Sizes

While CSS-in-JS provides a lot of flexibility, it can lead to larger bundle sizes compared to traditional CSS. Since styles are generated dynamically in the browser, the CSS is bundled with the JavaScript code, which can make the overall bundle size larger than expected.

While tools like tree-shaking and code-splitting can help reduce the final bundle size, developers need to be mindful of the potential impact on performance and page load times, especially in mobile environments where bandwidth is limited.

4. Complex Debugging

CSS-in-JS can sometimes make debugging more complex compared to traditional CSS. In conventional stylesheets, it’s easy to track down a style by inspecting the class name and finding the corresponding rules in the .css file. With CSS-in-JS, styles are often dynamically generated, making it harder to identify the source of a specific style when inspecting elements in the browser.

However, many CSS-in-JS libraries have added support for better debugging tools, like displaying meaningful class names in development mode, but this can still be a challenge, especially in larger projects where styles are dynamically created based on props or states.

5. Tooling and Ecosystem Fragmentation

While CSS-in-JS is gaining popularity, it has not yet reached the same level of widespread adoption as traditional CSS methods like Sass or LESS. This can lead to ecosystem fragmentation, where developers need to work with different tools and libraries, depending on the project.

For example, Styled Components, Emotion, and JSS all have different APIs and features, which can make it harder to switch between projects that use different CSS-in-JS libraries. Additionally, CSS-in-JS may not integrate seamlessly with every build tool, especially in legacy environments, making it less portable than traditional CSS.

When to Use CSS-in-JS

CSS-in-JS is not a one-size-fits-all solution, and its effectiveness depends on the specific requirements of your project. Here are some scenarios where CSS-in-JS can be a particularly good choice:

Component-Based Development: If you’re building an application with React, Vue, or another component-based framework, CSS-in-JS can simplify your workflow by keeping styles and logic closely coupled within components.

Dynamic Styling Needs: If your project requires a lot of dynamic styling, such as changing styles based on props, state, or user interaction, CSS-in-JS offers a flexible way to manage these changes without writing complex class toggling logic.

Theming and Scoped Styles: CSS-in-JS makes it easy to implement theming and scoped styles, making it a great fit for applications that need to support multiple themes or require style isolation to prevent conflicts.

Small to Medium-Sized Projects: CSS-in-JS works well for small to medium-sized projects where performance overhead and bundle size are less of a concern. For larger projects with performance-critical requirements, consider carefully evaluating the trade-offs.

Performance Considerations with CSS-in-JS

If performance is a top priority for your application, you need to weigh the benefits of CSS-in-JS against potential performance bottlenecks. While CSS-in-JS offers dynamic styling and scoped styles, it often introduces runtime processing, especially if styles are generated on the fly.

There are several strategies to mitigate performance issues with CSS-in-JS:

1. Server-Side Rendering (SSR)

One way to reduce the performance impact of CSS-in-JS is to use server-side rendering. Libraries like Styled Components and Emotion support SSR, allowing styles to be generated and injected into the HTML before it’s sent to the client. This reduces the time the browser spends processing styles at runtime and improves initial page load times.

2. CSS Extraction

Some CSS-in-JS libraries provide tools to extract CSS into static files during the build process, eliminating the need to generate styles dynamically in the browser. This can significantly reduce the JavaScript bundle size and improve overall performance.

For example, Styled Components has a Babel plugin that can extract static styles at compile time:

npm install --save-dev babel-plugin-styled-components

With this setup, static styles are pre-generated and loaded just like traditional CSS, resulting in faster render times.

3. Memoizing Styles

Memoization is another performance optimization technique where CSS-in-JS styles are cached, preventing unnecessary recalculations on every render. By caching style objects or functions, you reduce the overhead associated with repeatedly generating styles in components that frequently re-render.

Alternatives to CSS-in-JS

While CSS-in-JS has its merits, it’s important to consider some alternative approaches for styling web applications, particularly if you’re facing challenges like bundle size, performance overhead, or a steep learning curve. Many developers still rely on traditional CSS methods, preprocessors, and modern CSS techniques to create scalable, maintainable styles for their projects.

While CSS-in-JS has its merits, it’s important to consider some alternative approaches for styling web applications, particularly if you’re facing challenges like bundle size, performance overhead, or a steep learning curve.

Below are some alternative options to CSS-in-JS, along with their pros and cons, that might better suit your needs depending on the size and complexity of your project:

1. Traditional CSS and CSS Modules

Traditional CSS, where styles are written in .css files, has been the go-to method for web development for decades. This approach is still widely used, but a more modern alternative is CSS Modules.

CSS Modules allow you to scope your styles locally to a component, preventing the global scope pollution often associated with traditional CSS. This method provides many of the same benefits as CSS-in-JS, like scoped styles and the ability to avoid naming conflicts, but without the runtime overhead.

Example of CSS Modules in a React component:

// Button.module.css
.button {
background-color: blue;
color: white;
padding: 10px 20px;
}

// Button.js
import React from 'react';
import styles from './Button.module.css';

function Button() {
return <button className={styles.button}>Click Me</button>;
}

export default Button;

2. Sass/SCSS (CSS Preprocessors)

Sass and SCSS are CSS preprocessors that add powerful features like variables, nested rules, and mixins to vanilla CSS, making it easier to write maintainable and reusable styles. Unlike CSS-in-JS, Sass generates static CSS files that are then used throughout the project, ensuring no runtime overhead.

Example of Sass (SCSS) usage:

$primary-color: blue;

.button {
background-color: $primary-color;
padding: 10px 20px;
border-radius: 5px;
&:hover {
background-color: darken($primary-color, 10%);
}
}

3. Tailwind CSS (Utility-First CSS)

Tailwind CSS is a utility-first CSS framework that provides pre-defined classes for controlling layout, spacing, typography, and other aspects of UI design. Unlike traditional CSS or Sass, Tailwind encourages writing styles directly in your HTML using utility classes. This approach is somewhat similar to CSS-in-JS in that it provides component-level styling without maintaining separate CSS files.

Example of Tailwind CSS:

<button class="bg-blue-500 text-white py-2 px-4 rounded hover:bg-blue-700">
Click Me
</button>

Pros:

  1. Fast development with predefined utility classes.
  2. Consistent design system across the project.
  3. No runtime overhead since styles are applied using static classes.

Cons:

  1. Less flexibility for custom styling compared to CSS-in-JS.
  2. HTML can become cluttered with utility classes.

4. Styled System

Styled System is a utility for building responsive, theme-based styled components. It’s often used with libraries like Styled Components or Emotion, combining the flexibility of CSS-in-JS with a utility-based approach. Styled System focuses on design tokens like spacing, color, and typography, allowing developers to rapidly prototype and maintain consistent designs.

Example using Styled System with Emotion:

/** @jsxImportSource @emotion/react */
import { css } from '@emotion/react';
import { space, layout, typography } from 'styled-system';

const Button = css`
${space}
${layout}
${typography}
`;

export default Button;

Pros:

  1. Combines utility classes with dynamic styling in components.
  2. Excellent for building design systems.
  3. Allows for a consistent, responsive UI.

Cons:

  1. Dependent on additional libraries, leading to larger bundle sizes.
  2. More complex to set up compared to standalone CSS or utility frameworks.

Best Practices for Using CSS-in-JS

If you choose to implement CSS-in-JS in your project, there are several best practices you should follow to ensure that your styles remain clean, maintainable, and performant.

1. Component-Driven Styling

Leverage the component-based nature of CSS-in-JS by keeping your styles tightly coupled with the logic they style. Avoid global styles whenever possible and rely on styled components or scoped styles within each component to prevent style conflicts.

2. Use Theme Providers

For consistent theming across your application, make use of Theme Providers provided by CSS-in-JS libraries like Styled Components or Emotion. This allows you to centralize your design tokens (colors, typography, spacing) and reuse them throughout the application.

3. Optimize Performance

If you’re working on a large-scale project, consider server-side rendering or CSS extraction to reduce the performance overhead associated with CSS-in-JS. Use memoization techniques and limit dynamic styles to critical components to avoid unnecessary re-renders and style recalculations.

4. Keep Styles Maintainable

While CSS-in-JS allows for dynamic and flexible styling, it’s easy to let styles become disorganized. Make sure to follow a clear, consistent structure for styling your components, use variables for design tokens, and avoid duplicating styles across components.

5. Consider the Learning Curve

If your team is new to CSS-in-JS, start small. Introduce the technique gradually, focusing on components that require dynamic styling or scoped styles. As your team becomes more familiar with the approach, you can expand its use across the entire project.

Conclusion: Is CSS-in-JS Right for You?

CSS-in-JS has revolutionized how developers approach styling in component-based frameworks, offering a powerful way to write dynamic, scoped, and reusable styles. Its strengths lie in its ability to keep styles closely coupled with components, implement theming effortlessly, and allow for dynamic styling based on props and state.

However, CSS-in-JS also has its drawbacks, including potential performance overhead, a steeper learning curve, and larger bundle sizes. It’s important to weigh the pros and cons carefully before deciding whether CSS-in-JS is the right solution for your project.

At PixelFree Studio, we recognize that modern web development requires a flexible, efficient approach to styling. While CSS-in-JS can offer a streamlined workflow and increased productivity, it’s essential to evaluate how it fits into your specific use case, team expertise, and project requirements. If you’re building highly dynamic, component-driven applications, CSS-in-JS may be the perfect tool to enhance your development process.

Read Next: