Variable fonts have revolutionized how we handle typography on the web. Instead of loading multiple font files for different weights and styles, a single variable font file can dynamically adjust a wide range of font attributes, such as weight, width, and slant. This brings immense flexibility to web design while reducing the number of HTTP requests, ultimately improving page performance.
However, despite their benefits, variable fonts are still relatively new, and with that comes a learning curve. From inconsistent browser support to performance concerns and misuse of font axes, variable fonts come with their own set of challenges. In this article, we’ll explore the potential pitfalls of using variable fonts in CSS and how you can avoid them to ensure your typography looks professional, is optimized for performance, and enhances user experience.
The Appeal of Variable Fonts
Before diving into the pitfalls, it’s important to understand why variable fonts are gaining traction. A single variable font file can contain multiple variations of a typeface, allowing you to adjust attributes such as weight, width, and even more advanced properties like optical size or italics without loading multiple font files. This means that a variable font can replace several static font files, which traditionally would require separate requests for different styles like bold, italic, or light.
Why Use Variable Fonts?
Performance Gains: Instead of loading multiple font files, a single variable font can serve all the different styles, reducing HTTP requests and potentially decreasing the overall file size.
Design Flexibility: Variable fonts allow precise control over typography, letting designers adjust font properties fluidly, offering more options for fine-tuning the design.
Consistency: You can maintain a consistent look and feel across different font weights, widths, and styles, ensuring design uniformity without compromising performance.
Despite these advantages, many developers stumble when implementing variable fonts. Below, we’ll outline the common pitfalls and how you can avoid them.
Pitfall #1: Poor Browser Support and Fallbacks
Although variable fonts are supported by most modern browsers, there are still compatibility issues, especially with older browsers like Internet Explorer or some versions of Firefox and Safari. If you’re not careful, using a variable font without proper fallbacks can lead to broken or inconsistent typography for users on unsupported browsers.
The Problem:
If your website relies solely on variable fonts without providing fallback fonts for unsupported browsers, users may encounter missing text, improper font rendering, or an entirely different font style that compromises the design.
The Fix: Implementing Fallback Fonts
To ensure consistent typography across all browsers, you should always provide fallback fonts in your CSS. This ensures that even in cases where the variable font is not supported, users can still experience a similar, readable design.
Here’s an example of how to define a variable font with proper fallbacks:
@font-face {
font-family: 'Inter';
src: url('fonts/Inter-Variable.woff2') format('woff2-variations');
font-weight: 100 900; /* Define the weight range */
}
body {
font-family: 'Inter', 'Arial', sans-serif; /* Fallback to Arial if unsupported */
}
In this example, if a browser doesn’t support variable fonts, it will revert to Arial or any system-defined sans-serif font. This approach ensures that users won’t encounter blank text or inconsistent font styles on unsupported browsers.
Pitfall #2: Mismanaging Font Axes
Variable fonts offer multiple axes that control various aspects of the font, including weight, width, slant, and even custom axes like optical size. However, mismanaging these axes—especially by overusing them—can result in bloated CSS, inconsistent design, or poor user experience due to performance impacts.
The Problem:
Some developers fall into the trap of over-styling text with unnecessary variations. For instance, if you define different weights or widths for each section of a webpage, it can lead to a confusing and inconsistent design, and in some cases, performance issues if the browser has to render too many different font variations.
Additionally, the W3C specification allows for custom axes, which, when not handled properly, can result in unpredictable behavior across browsers.
The Fix: Use Font Axes Thoughtfully and Sparingly
You should limit the use of font axes to the essential variations that enhance your design. Consider the readability and consistency of your typography when adjusting font properties, and avoid excessive customization for the sake of experimentation.
Here’s a more structured approach to using variable fonts with weight and width axes:
body {
font-family: 'Inter', sans-serif;
font-weight: 400; /* Default weight */
}
h1 {
font-weight: 700; /* Heavier for headers */
font-stretch: 120%; /* Slightly wider headings */
}
p {
font-weight: 300; /* Lighter for body text */
font-stretch: 100%; /* Standard width */
}
In this case, we’re controlling only two axes: font-weight and font-stretch. By making small, thoughtful adjustments, we create a clear hierarchy without overloading the design with excessive variation.
Pitfall #3: Performance Overhead from Excessive Variation
While variable fonts can reduce HTTP requests by consolidating styles into a single file, they can also introduce performance overhead if not used carefully. The more variations you define, the harder the browser has to work to render those styles, which can slow down rendering times.
The Problem:
Excessive variation leads to longer rendering times, especially on lower-end devices. This is particularly problematic if you dynamically change the font’s attributes (like weight or width) using JavaScript during runtime, as it requires additional calculations by the browser.
The Fix: Limit the Number of Font Variations
To avoid performance issues, keep the number of variations to a minimum and avoid dynamically adjusting multiple font axes in real time. Instead, aim for static configurations that the browser can render efficiently.
For example, instead of adjusting both weight and width dynamically, focus on adjusting one axis at a time:
/* Avoid combining too many axes */
h1 {
font-weight: 700;
font-stretch: 120%;
}
p {
font-weight: 400;
/* Avoid dynamic changes to width for body text */
}
If you need to create interactive designs where typography changes based on user interaction, consider limiting the axes to just one (such as weight) and predefine those changes in your CSS.
Pitfall #4: Lack of Visual Hierarchy
Variable fonts give you the ability to define typography with incredible precision. However, with this flexibility comes the risk of losing visual hierarchy. Inconsistent font weights, slants, and sizes across sections can confuse users and diminish the effectiveness of your design.
The Problem:
With multiple variations available at your fingertips, it’s easy to over-style text, resulting in a lack of clarity. Users rely on a clear hierarchy to navigate content effectively, and too much variation in font styles can lead to confusion.
The Fix: Establish a Clear Typographic Hierarchy
When working with variable fonts, it’s important to maintain a consistent hierarchy across your design. Stick to a limited number of variations to ensure your headings, body text, and captions are distinguishable and easily readable.
Here’s an example of a consistent typographic hierarchy:
h1 {
font-weight: 700;
font-size: 2.5rem;
}
h2 {
font-weight: 600;
font-size: 2rem;
}
p {
font-weight: 400;
font-size: 1rem;
}
small {
font-weight: 300;
font-size: 0.875rem;
}
By sticking to clear, predefined font weights and sizes, you establish a visual hierarchy that guides the user through the content in a logical and easy-to-read way. This also ensures consistency across your design.
Pitfall #5: Accessibility Concerns
One of the most overlooked issues when using variable fonts is accessibility. If variable fonts are not implemented with accessibility in mind, they can negatively impact users with visual impairments or cognitive disabilities. For instance, overly condensed fonts may be harder to read, and rapid changes in font weight or style may overwhelm users with dyslexia or other reading challenges.
The Problem:
When designers experiment too much with weight, slant, or width, the resulting typography may not meet WCAG accessibility standards. This could result in poor readability, especially for users who rely on clear, legible fonts.
The Fix: Prioritize Readability and Follow Accessibility Guidelines
To ensure that your use of variable fonts is accessible, always prioritize readability and contrast. Avoid overly narrow or light fonts for body text, and ensure sufficient contrast between text and background. Additionally, test your typography across a range of screen readers and devices to confirm that it is readable for all users.
Here’s an example of accessible variable font usage:
body {
font-family: 'Inter', sans-serif;
font-weight: 400;
line-height: 1.6;
}
h1, h2, h3 {
font-weight: 700;
margin-bottom: 1rem;
}
p {
font-weight: 400;
font-stretch: 100%; /* Avoid extreme width variations */
font-size: 1rem; /* Ensure sufficient size for readability */
color: #333; /* Ensure high contrast for accessibility */
}
By maintaining adequate contrast and avoiding overly light or condensed fonts for key content areas, you create a more accessible and inclusive website.
Pitfall #6: Failing to Use Optical Size
Some variable fonts offer an optical size axis, which adjusts the letterforms to be more readable at smaller sizes. However, many developers either overlook this feature or fail to implement it correctly, leading to readability issues, particularly on mobile devices.
The Problem:
Without leveraging the optical size axis, text that looks great at larger sizes may become hard to read at smaller sizes. This is especially important for body text, where clarity and legibility are key to providing a smooth reading experience.
The Fix: Implement Optical Size Adjustments
If your variable font includes an optical size axis, use it to adjust typography based on the size of the text. This ensures that small text remains legible without sacrificing style or design integrity.
Here’s an example:
@font-face {
font-family: 'SerifPro';
src: url('fonts/SerifPro-Variable.woff2') format('woff2-variations');
font-variation-settings: 'opsz' 16; /* Use optical size for smaller text */
}
p {
font-family: 'SerifPro', serif;
font-size: 0.875rem;
font-variation-settings: 'opsz' 12; /* Smaller text requires adjustment */
}
By using the optical size axis, you ensure that your text maintains legibility across all screen sizes and resolutions.
Advanced Techniques for Working with Variable Fonts
Once you’ve mastered the basic principles of using variable fonts, it’s time to explore advanced techniques that can help you get even more out of this powerful technology. By implementing these techniques, you can push the boundaries of web typography, ensuring your fonts are dynamic, efficient, and tailored to the needs of your project.
1. Dynamic Typography with CSS Transitions and Variable Fonts
One of the most exciting aspects of variable fonts is their potential for dynamic transitions. Because variable fonts allow you to adjust properties like weight, slant, and width in real-time, you can create smooth transitions between different font states. This opens up possibilities for interactive typography, where font styles change based on user interaction, scrolling, or hover effects.
The Problem:
While the flexibility of variable fonts allows for dynamic changes, overusing transitions—especially with multiple font properties can lead to performance bottlenecks, especially on slower devices or browsers. If too many properties are animated at once, the browser may struggle to render the changes efficiently, resulting in lag or stuttering animations.
The Fix: Use Smooth, Limited Transitions
To maintain performance while using transitions, limit the number of properties you animate. Focus on transitioning just one or two properties, such as weight or slant, and ensure the transitions are smooth and subtle.
Here’s an example of a smooth transition between font weights on hover:
h1 {
font-family: 'Inter', sans-serif;
font-weight: 400;
transition: font-weight 0.3s ease-in-out;
}
h1:hover {
font-weight: 700;
}
In this example, the font weight changes smoothly from normal to bold when the user hovers over the heading, creating a dynamic effect without overloading the browser with multiple transitions.
You can also apply transitions based on scrolling to create parallax-like typography effects:
/* Adjust font weight as the user scrolls down the page */
@keyframes weightShift {
from {
font-weight: 400;
}
to {
font-weight: 900;
}
}
h1 {
font-family: 'Inter', sans-serif;
font-weight: 400;
animation: weightShift 3s linear infinite;
}
This animation example smoothly adjusts the font weight as the user scrolls or interacts with the page, giving a more engaging user experience.
2. Combining Variable Fonts with CSS Grid for Dynamic Layouts
While variable fonts give you control over typography, they can be combined with modern layout techniques like CSS Grid to create dynamic, responsive designs. By pairing variable fonts with CSS Grid, you can create text layouts that adapt seamlessly across different screen sizes, ensuring that typography remains legible and aesthetically pleasing.
The Problem:
Designers often struggle to maintain consistent typography across different screen sizes. When combining variable fonts with CSS Grid, text may become too small, cramped, or improperly aligned if the layout isn’t carefully managed.
The Fix: Responsive Grid Layouts with Adjusted Typography
To create a truly dynamic and responsive design, adjust both the font properties and grid structure simultaneously. By fine-tuning both aspects, you can ensure the design works seamlessly at any screen size.
Here’s how you can create a responsive grid with dynamically adjustable typography:
.grid-container {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(300px, 1fr));
gap: 20px;
}
h1 {
font-family: 'Inter', sans-serif;
font-weight: 700;
font-stretch: 120%; /* Slightly stretch the text for wide grid columns */
font-size: 2rem;
}
@media (max-width: 768px) {
h1 {
font-stretch: 100%; /* Narrow text for smaller grid columns */
font-size: 1.5rem; /* Adjust font size for smaller screens */
}
}
By combining CSS Grid with responsive typography adjustments, you ensure that your text adapts to different screen sizes without sacrificing readability or style.
3. Using JavaScript for Fine-Grained Control
While CSS can handle many aspects of variable fonts, using JavaScript allows for even more fine-grained control. With JavaScript, you can dynamically adjust variable font properties based on user interaction, time, or other factors.
The Problem:
Relying too heavily on JavaScript for typography adjustments can lead to performance issues, especially if the changes are too frequent or involve multiple font properties. JavaScript-driven animations and interactions should always be optimized to avoid slowing down the user experience.
The Fix: Optimize JavaScript-Based Typography Changes
When using JavaScript to control variable fonts, focus on delivering small, meaningful changes rather than constant updates. This approach minimizes the strain on the browser and ensures smooth rendering.
Here’s an example of using JavaScript to dynamically adjust the font weight based on a user’s input:
<input type="range" min="100" max="900" value="400" id="fontWeightSlider">
<p id="text">Adjust the font weight using the slider</p>
<script>
const slider = document.getElementById('fontWeightSlider');
const text = document.getElementById('text');
slider.addEventListener('input', (event) => {
const weight = event.target.value;
text.style.fontVariationSettings = `'wght' ${weight}`;
});
</script>
In this example, the user can adjust the font weight of the paragraph text in real time using a slider. This allows for an interactive experience, where typography responds directly to user input.
4. Optimizing Variable Fonts for Performance
While variable fonts can reduce the number of HTTP requests by combining multiple font styles into a single file, the file size of variable fonts can sometimes be larger than expected, especially if the font contains many axes or a wide range of weights. This can negatively impact performance if not properly managed.
The Problem:
Large variable font files, especially those with multiple axes and many potential variations, can increase load times, particularly on mobile devices or slow networks. Even though fewer requests are made, the size of the single font file can still be substantial.
The Fix: Subset Variable Fonts and Optimize for Web
To mitigate performance issues, consider subsetting your variable font to include only the necessary ranges of weights, widths, or other axes. Tools like Google’s Webfont Tools or Font Squirrel allow you to subset fonts, reducing the overall file size.
For example, if you only need font weights between 300 and 700, you can remove other weights from the file:
@font-face {
font-family: 'Inter';
src: url('fonts/Inter-Variable.woff2') format('woff2-variations');
font-weight: 300 700; /* Limit the range of weights */
}
By limiting the font weight range, you reduce the file size and improve page load performance.
5. Combining Variable Fonts with System Fonts for Enhanced Performance
For a performance-first approach, consider combining variable fonts with system fonts. System fonts, which are already available on the user’s device, load instantly, making them a great option for body text, while variable fonts can be reserved for headlines or specific design elements that require more visual distinction.
The Problem:
While variable fonts offer design flexibility, they can still add weight to a page’s load time, especially if overused. Relying solely on variable fonts for all text can sometimes degrade performance, especially on mobile networks.
The Fix: Use System Fonts for Body Text and Variable Fonts for Headlines
By combining system fonts with variable fonts, you can strike a balance between performance and design flexibility. For instance, use system fonts for body text, which will load quickly, and apply variable fonts only to elements that benefit from their flexibility, like headings or special UI elements.
Here’s how you might structure your CSS:
/* System font for body text */
body {
font-family: 'Arial', sans-serif; /* Fast-loading system font */
font-size: 1rem;
}
/* Variable font for headlines */
h1 {
font-family: 'Inter', sans-serif;
font-weight: 700;
font-stretch: 120%;
}
This strategy ensures that your website loads quickly while still offering visually distinct typography where it matters most.
Conclusion: Mastering Variable Fonts for Web Design
Variable fonts are a game-changer for modern web design, offering flexibility and performance improvements that can elevate your website’s typography. However, with this power comes responsibility. Misusing variable fonts—whether through poor browser support, overuse of font axes, or lack of accessibility—can lead to performance issues, inconsistent designs, and poor user experiences.
To get the most out of variable fonts, follow these best practices:
- Always provide fallback fonts to ensure compatibility across browsers.
- Use font axes thoughtfully and avoid excessive variations that could confuse users or slow down performance.
- Maintain a clear visual hierarchy by limiting font weight and size variations.
- Prioritize accessibility, ensuring that your typography is readable for all users.
- Leverage the optical size axis to optimize typography across different text sizes and devices.
By mastering these techniques, you’ll be able to fully harness the power of variable fonts while avoiding common pitfalls, creating dynamic, responsive, and highly readable typography across all devices and platforms.
Read Next: