Viewport units—VW (viewport width) and VH (viewport height)—have become popular tools in modern web design. These units provide an easy way to create responsive layouts by sizing elements relative to the size of the browser’s viewport. They offer a flexible alternative to fixed units like pixels or percentages, which can sometimes struggle to adapt across different devices and screen sizes. However, while viewport units seem straightforward, they can introduce a range of issues if not used carefully. From unexpected scroll behavior to performance hiccups, VW and VH can cause trouble if their limitations aren’t fully understood.
In this article, we’ll explore the common pitfalls of viewport units, why they happen, and how to avoid them. We’ll cover everything from responsive design quirks to the intricacies of mobile browsers, and by the end, you’ll have actionable strategies to ensure your use of VW and VH is effective and problem-free.
Understanding VW and VH: A Quick Overview
Before diving into the pitfalls, let’s quickly define how viewport units work:
VW: 1 VW unit equals 1% of the viewport’s width. If the viewport is 1000 pixels wide, then 1 VW equals 10 pixels.
VH: 1 VH unit equals 1% of the viewport’s height. If the viewport height is 800 pixels, then 1 VH equals 8 pixels.
These units allow you to size elements relative to the browser window, making it easier to create designs that scale with the screen size. For example, you might use width: 50vw to ensure an element always takes up 50% of the viewport’s width, regardless of the device size.
But while VW and VH are flexible and convenient, they don’t always behave as expected—particularly when dealing with mobile devices, dynamic content, or more complex layouts.
Pitfall #1: Mobile Viewport Height Inconsistencies
One of the most frustrating issues with VH units is how mobile browsers handle the viewport height. Mobile devices, unlike desktop browsers, often include dynamic UI elements like address bars and toolbars that appear and disappear as the user scrolls. These elements change the height of the viewport, causing VH-based elements to resize unexpectedly.
The Problem:
When you use VH on a mobile device, the viewport height can change depending on whether the browser’s address bar is visible. For instance, if you set an element to height: 100vh, it may look fine initially, but as the user scrolls and the browser’s UI collapses, the viewport height increases, causing the element to resize and potentially creating a layout shift.
Example:
.hero {
height: 100vh; /* Takes the full height of the viewport */
}
This approach works well on desktop but can cause jarring behavior on mobile as the viewport height changes dynamically.
The Fix:
A common solution to this problem is using CSS custom properties and JavaScript to calculate and update the correct height dynamically. This ensures the height remains stable even when the viewport changes on mobile devices.
// Calculate the real viewport height and set it as a custom property
function updateVH() {
let vh = window.innerHeight * 0.01;
document.documentElement.style.setProperty('--vh', `${vh}px`);
}
window.addEventListener('resize', updateVH);
updateVH(); // Call on initial load
Then, in your CSS, you can use this custom property:
.hero {
height: calc(var(--vh, 1vh) * 100); /* Uses the calculated viewport height */
}
This method ensures that your design remains consistent, even on mobile browsers with dynamic UI elements.
Pitfall #2: Scrollbars and Viewport Width (VW)
When working with VW units, another common issue is the presence of scrollbars. On some devices or browsers, vertical scrollbars take up space on the screen but are not accounted for in the viewport width. This can cause elements sized with VW to be slightly too wide, leading to unintended horizontal scrolling.
The Problem:
If you set an element’s width to 100vw, it will take up the entire width of the viewport, including the area occupied by a vertical scrollbar. This can push content slightly beyond the viewport, causing a horizontal scrollbar to appear.
Example:
.container {
width: 100vw; /* Includes scrollbar width, causing overflow */
}
On browsers where scrollbars overlap the content (such as macOS browsers with hidden scrollbars), this may not be a problem. But on Windows or other platforms where scrollbars take up space, the container will be wider than the visible area, leading to horizontal scrolling.
The Fix:
To avoid this issue, use a combination of CSS and JavaScript to calculate the correct width, excluding the scrollbar. You can use 100% width instead of 100vw, or dynamically adjust the width to account for the scrollbar:
.container {
width: 100%;
max-width: 100vw; /* Ensures no overflow even with scrollbars */
}
Alternatively, use JavaScript to calculate the difference between the viewport width and the scrollbar:
function updateContainerWidth() {
let vw = window.innerWidth - document.documentElement.clientWidth;
document.documentElement.style.setProperty('--container-width', `${vw}px`);
}
window.addEventListener('resize', updateContainerWidth);
updateContainerWidth();
This approach gives you more precise control over the element’s width and prevents the appearance of unexpected scrollbars.
Pitfall #3: Issues with Nested Flexbox and Viewport Units
Viewport units can also cause issues when combined with Flexbox layouts, particularly when flex containers are nested. In some cases, using VW or VH for sizing in combination with Flexbox can lead to unexpected overflow or misalignment.
The Problem:
When a flex container or its children use VH or VW for height or width, the browser may calculate the dimensions in ways that don’t align with the expected flex behavior. This can cause overflow, unexpected scrolling, or incorrect alignment.
For example, a child element using 100vh inside a flex container may expand beyond the intended space, especially if the flex parent is designed to scroll or shrink based on content.
Example:
.flex-container {
display: flex;
height: 100vh; /* Full height of the viewport */
}
.flex-item {
height: 100vh; /* Can cause overflow or incorrect sizing */
}
The Fix:
To prevent conflicts between Flexbox and viewport units, avoid mixing these two layout techniques for critical sizing. Instead of using VH or VW, allow Flexbox to manage the layout, and only use viewport units for elements that are truly independent of the flex container’s sizing.
Example:
.flex-item {
flex-grow: 1; /* Let Flexbox manage the size */
min-height: 0; /* Prevent overflow */
}
By letting Flexbox control the size, you avoid the common pitfalls of combining it with viewport units.
Pitfall #4: Oversized Elements on Large Screens
One of the core benefits of VW and VH is their responsiveness. However, this flexibility can backfire on large screens. If you size elements purely based on viewport units, they can grow excessively large on large monitors or TVs, leading to awkwardly scaled content and poor usability.
The Problem:
When using large viewport units like width: 80vw or height: 90vh, elements can scale up dramatically on devices with larger screens, making text and other UI components disproportionately large.
Example:
.hero-title {
font-size: 10vw; /* Looks great on mobile, but too large on large screens */
}
On a mobile device, 10 VW might translate to 32 pixels, but on a 4K display, it could become unmanageably large.
The Fix:
To handle large screens more effectively, use media queries to adjust viewport-based units based on screen size. This way, you can cap the scaling effect and prevent elements from becoming too large.
Example with media queries:
.hero-title {
font-size: 10vw; /* Works for smaller screens */
}
@media (min-width: 1200px) {
.hero-title {
font-size: 6vw; /* Scales down on larger screens */
}
}
This method ensures that your design remains responsive without becoming overwhelming on large displays.
Pitfall #5: Layout Shifts with Dynamic Content
Another issue with viewport units is their interaction with dynamic content. If your page includes elements that load after the initial page render (such as images, videos, or iframes), these elements can cause unexpected layout shifts, particularly if their size is defined using VW or VH.
The Problem:
Dynamic content can cause elements sized with VW and VH to resize or shift as the viewport adjusts. This can lead to content jumping or reflowing unexpectedly, especially when combined with lazy-loading techniques.
Example:
.image-container {
width: 50vw;
height: 50vh; /* Sized to viewport, but shifts when content loads */
}
If the image takes longer to load or if additional content is inserted after the page render, the element’s size might shift, leading to layout instability.
The Fix:
To avoid layout shifts, always provide fallback dimensions for elements that rely on dynamic content. Predefine the dimensions for images, videos, and other media to ensure that the layout remains stable as the content loads.
.image-container {
width: 50vw;
height: 50vh;
background-color: #e0e0e0; /* Placeholder color to prevent shifts */
}
Alternatively, use the CSS property aspect-ratio to maintain a consistent size for media elements, even before they load:
img {
aspect-ratio: 16/9;
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
This approach ensures that the layout remains stable and prevents unexpected shifts when dynamic content is introduced.
Advanced Techniques for Handling Viewport Units in Complex Layouts
Now that we’ve covered the basic pitfalls and solutions for viewport units (VW and VH), let’s explore some advanced techniques for dealing with more complex layouts. Whether you’re working with intricate grid systems, integrating third-party widgets, or ensuring accessibility, understanding how to handle viewport units in these scenarios can make or break the success of your design.
1. Combining Viewport Units with CSS Grid for Complex Layouts
CSS Grid is one of the most powerful layout tools in modern web design, and it can work harmoniously with viewport units when used correctly. Grid allows you to create intricate layouts without the need for complicated positioning or flex hacks. However, viewport units can introduce issues in grid-based layouts, especially when grid items are sized using VW or VH.
The Problem:
When grid items use VW or VH for their width or height, they may not respond well to changes in content size or dynamic resizing, leading to overflow issues, misalignment, or excessive white space. This can be particularly problematic in responsive designs where grid layouts need to adjust seamlessly across devices.
Example:
.grid-container {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr;
grid-gap: 20px;
height: 100vh; /* Full viewport height */
}
.grid-item {
width: 50vw; /* May cause misalignment or overflow in the grid */
}
The Fix:
When using CSS Grid, it’s often better to let the grid system handle the layout’s sizing, while keeping viewport units for elements outside the grid (such as headers, footers, or standalone containers). Use fractional units (fr) or percentages for grid items and combine them with min/max properties to create more flexible, adaptable layouts.
Example with a responsive grid layout:
.grid-container {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(200px, 1fr)); /* Flexible, responsive columns */
grid-gap: 20px;
}
.grid-item {
height: 50vh; /* VH for vertical sizing, but let Grid control width */
}
By using minmax() and fractional units (fr), the grid remains responsive, with items adapting to the viewport size without causing overflow or layout shifts.
2. Preventing Content Overlap in Multi-Layer Designs
In more complex web designs—such as those involving multiple layers of content (e.g., overlays, modals, and pop-ups)—viewport units can sometimes lead to content overlap or misalignment. This is especially true when elements are positioned with fixed or absolute positioning, as these elements often rely on viewport dimensions to determine their size or position.
The Problem:
If you use VW or VH for sizing or positioning in these scenarios, fixed-position elements like headers or modals can overlap or clash with other content, especially when the viewport size changes unexpectedly (e.g., on mobile devices).
Example:
.header {
position: fixed;
top: 0;
height: 10vh; /* 10% of the viewport height */
width: 100vw;
}
.modal {
position: fixed;
top: 20vh; /* Positioned relative to the viewport height */
width: 80vw;
}
In this case, resizing the viewport might cause the modal to overlap the header, or the modal may not display correctly on certain screen sizes.
The Fix:
To avoid content overlap, ensure that your fixed-position elements have well-defined relationships in terms of positioning and spacing. Instead of relying entirely on VH or VW for positioning, use relative units (like em or rem) and calc() to ensure elements are properly spaced regardless of viewport changes.
Example:
.header {
position: fixed;
top: 0;
height: 10vh;
width: 100vw;
}
.modal {
position: fixed;
top: calc(10vh + 20px); /* Accounts for header height and adds padding */
width: 80vw;
}
By using calc(), you can create dynamic spacing that adjusts based on the header’s height and additional padding, preventing overlap and ensuring that the modal remains properly positioned even on different screen sizes.
3. Using Viewport Units for Responsive Typography
Viewport units are often used to create responsive typography, where text sizes adjust based on the size of the viewport. While this can be a powerful technique for creating scalable designs, it can also lead to unintended consequences, such as text becoming too small on mobile devices or too large on wide-screen monitors.
The Problem:
If you use VW or VH for font sizes without setting boundaries, your text may scale disproportionately, making it difficult to read on smaller screens or overwhelming on larger displays.
Example:
h1 {
font-size: 5vw; /* Scales based on viewport width */
}
On a desktop, 5vw might result in a reasonable font size, but on a mobile device, it could shrink too much, making the text hard to read.
The Fix:
To solve this issue, combine viewport units with media queries or use the clamp() function, which allows you to set minimum and maximum limits on font size, ensuring the text scales appropriately across different devices.
Example with clamp():
h1 {
font-size: clamp(16px, 5vw, 48px); /* Min size 16px, max size 48px */
}
In this example, the clamp() function ensures that the font size scales with the viewport but stays within a reasonable range. This guarantees the text remains legible on both small and large screens.
4. Handling Accessibility and Readability with VW and VH
When using VW and VH for elements that impact accessibility—such as text, buttons, or interactive elements—it’s important to ensure that these units don’t compromise readability or usability. Scaling elements too aggressively can make your site harder to use, especially for users with visual impairments.
The Problem:
Using viewport units for interactive elements like buttons or form inputs can result in elements that are too small to interact with comfortably, particularly on mobile devices where precise touch input is necessary.
Example:
.button {
width: 20vw; /* Scales down on small screens, making it hard to tap */
height: 5vh;
}
On small devices, a button sized with VW and VH might become too small, making it difficult for users to interact with, violating accessibility guidelines.
The Fix:
To ensure accessibility, set minimum and maximum sizes for interactive elements. You can use media queries or the clamp() function to provide consistent sizing for touch targets, ensuring that buttons and form elements remain usable regardless of the screen size.
Example with media queries for responsive buttons:
.button {
width: 20vw;
height: 5vh;
}
@media (max-width: 600px) {
.button {
min-width: 100px;
min-height: 40px; /* Ensures the button remains a usable size */
}
}
This approach ensures that your site remains accessible, with all interactive elements sized appropriately for all users.
5. Viewport Units and Fluid Layouts
For fluid layouts—designs that scale dynamically based on screen size—viewport units can be a useful tool. However, combining VW and VH with other fluid units like percentages or rems can sometimes lead to conflicting behavior, where elements scale too aggressively or fail to align properly.
The Problem:
When combining fluid units like VW with percentages or em-based layouts, the elements may not scale proportionally, leading to awkward spacing or misaligned content.
Example:
.container {
width: 80vw;
}
.text {
font-size: 2rem;
margin: 5%; /* Percentages and viewport units might conflict */
}
In this case, the text size and margin may not align well with the container, especially as the viewport resizes.
The Fix:
To create a more consistent fluid layout, use consistent units across your design. If you’re using viewport units for width or height, consider using them for spacing and font sizes as well to ensure a harmonious scaling experience. Alternatively, use a combination of fluid typography and CSS Grid or Flexbox to maintain a balanced layout.
Example of a fluid layout with consistent units:
.container {
width: 80vw;
padding: 5vw; /* Consistent spacing with VW */
}
.text {
font-size: 3vw; /* Scales with viewport */
}
By keeping the units consistent, you avoid conflicts and ensure that all elements scale proportionally, creating a smoother, more balanced fluid layout.
Conclusion: Mastering VW and VH with Best Practices
Viewport units are incredibly powerful for creating responsive designs that scale effortlessly across devices. However, as we’ve seen, they can introduce a range of issues—from mobile viewport height inconsistencies to unexpected scrollbars and layout shifts. To master VW and VH, it’s important to understand their limitations and use them strategically.
Here’s a summary of best practices for avoiding the pitfalls of viewport units:
Use CSS custom properties and JavaScript to manage viewport height (VH) on mobile devices where the UI can change dynamically.
Avoid using 100vw for full-width elements to prevent horizontal scrollbars—use 100% or adjust for the scrollbar width.
Let Flexbox or Grid control layout sizes and avoid mixing viewport units with these layout techniques.
Adjust for large screens using media queries to prevent elements from scaling too large.
Predefine sizes for dynamic content like images or videos to prevent layout shifts during loading.
By following these strategies, you can take full advantage of viewport units without falling into the common traps that can harm the user experience. At PixelFree Studio, we believe that the best designs are not only responsive but also stable and performant. By mastering VW and VH and understanding their intricacies, you can create layouts that look polished and behave predictably, no matter the device or screen size.
Read Next:
